<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Few, We Happy Few&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://www.podcastpedant.com/2006/05/19/we-few-we-happy-few/</link>
	<description>Taking this crap too seriously since 2005</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Hapax Legomenon</title>
		<link>http://www.podcastpedant.com/2006/05/19/we-few-we-happy-few/#comment-215</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 12:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.podcastpedant.com/2006/05/19/we-few-we-happy-few/#comment-215</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;I'm a relative newcomer to literary podcasting and still learning the ropes (and still facing the uphill learning curve). &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The work-to-audience size ratio is definitely something I keep my eye on; at some point you have to ask whether the extra work involved in producing an audio production  justifies the wider audience, especially if we're just talking about a few hundred people. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Actually though, I'm hitting another roadblock that came totally unexpected: how podcast freezes a literary creation. I work on an erudite erotica web project and am used to doing lots of revision months or even years after I put up what I considered to be a final draft of a story. That actually is what I love about the web: that the website will always have the latest and greatest version. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But with podcasting (and book publishing I guess), you are essentially admitting that the version you record will essentially be the canonical version. After that you no longer will do any more revisions (or else obligate yourself to rerecord the story). &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The other issue I'm facing is: what to podcast, what simply to leave in simple text form. Podcasting is portable and has presence, but text is faster  to consume and more WYSIWIG.  The danger, I'm discovering, is podcasting TOO MUCH of my written content and deciding what kind of material is better left as a podcast, what kind of material is better left as a webpost, and what kind of material should be both.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a relative newcomer to literary podcasting and still learning the ropes (and still facing the uphill learning curve). </p>
<p>The work-to-audience size ratio is definitely something I keep my eye on; at some point you have to ask whether the extra work involved in producing an audio production  justifies the wider audience, especially if we&#8217;re just talking about a few hundred people. </p>
<p>Actually though, I&#8217;m hitting another roadblock that came totally unexpected: how podcast freezes a literary creation. I work on an erudite erotica web project and am used to doing lots of revision months or even years after I put up what I considered to be a final draft of a story. That actually is what I love about the web: that the website will always have the latest and greatest version. </p>
<p>But with podcasting (and book publishing I guess), you are essentially admitting that the version you record will essentially be the canonical version. After that you no longer will do any more revisions (or else obligate yourself to rerecord the story). </p>
<p>The other issue I&#8217;m facing is: what to podcast, what simply to leave in simple text form. Podcasting is portable and has presence, but text is faster  to consume and more WYSIWIG.  The danger, I&#8217;m discovering, is podcasting TOO MUCH of my written content and deciding what kind of material is better left as a podcast, what kind of material is better left as a webpost, and what kind of material should be both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Evo Terra</title>
		<link>http://www.podcastpedant.com/2006/05/19/we-few-we-happy-few/#comment-198</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 04:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.podcastpedant.com/2006/05/19/we-few-we-happy-few/#comment-198</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Dammit. And here I was all set to drop a few commitments. Thanks for the perspective, Chris!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dammit. And here I was all set to drop a few commitments. Thanks for the perspective, Chris!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: James Bortmas</title>
		<link>http://www.podcastpedant.com/2006/05/19/we-few-we-happy-few/#comment-191</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 15:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.podcastpedant.com/2006/05/19/we-few-we-happy-few/#comment-191</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Glenn Reynolds in his book An Army of Davids warns the media about podcasting and weblogs.  &quot;Beware the people who are having fun competing with you!&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn Reynolds in his book An Army of Davids warns the media about podcasting and weblogs.  &#8220;Beware the people who are having fun competing with you!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mark Forman</title>
		<link>http://www.podcastpedant.com/2006/05/19/we-few-we-happy-few/#comment-188</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 18:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.podcastpedant.com/2006/05/19/we-few-we-happy-few/#comment-188</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Nicely written Chris. &quot;Amateurs&quot; people who do something out of love.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicely written Chris. &#8220;Amateurs&#8221; people who do something out of love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
